London, United Kingdom - July 18, 2024

In a controversial ruling that has sparked widespread condemnation, Southwark Crown Court sentenced five climate activists to multi-year prison terms for their involvement in a peaceful protest. Roger Hallam, Daniel Shaw, Lucia Whittaker De Abreu, Louise Lancaster, and Cressida Gethin received sentences ranging from four to five years for conspiracy to cause a public nuisance related to a motorway disruption in November 2022.

The sentencing has surpassed previous judgments on similar cases, illustrating a severe crackdown on nonviolent climate activism. Earlier, Amy Pritchard was sentenced to 10 months for breaking a window at JP Morgan, the world’s largest fossil fuel funder.

During the trial, Judge Christopher Hehir dismissed climate concerns as irrelevant, prohibiting the jury from considering evidence of the imminent dangers posed by fossil fuel consumption. This decision has drawn sharp criticism from experts and activists, including Professor Bill McGuire and Sir David King, who denounced the verdict as an assault on free speech and scientific fact.

Chris Packham, renowned naturalist and broadcaster, labeled the trial a "sham," urging an end to what he perceives as judicial overreach influenced by corporate interests. Packham joined supporters at court and called for reforms to prevent the silencing of environmental defenders.

The case has sparked a public outcry, with over 14,000 people signing a petition demanding an end to the imprisonment of activists advocating for climate action.

As tensions mount, advocates hope for a reconsideration of these sentences and a shift toward recognizing the urgency of addressing climate change through peaceful activism rather than punitive measures.